resolve.lsqr¶
Sparse Equations and Least Squares.
The original Fortran code was written by C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders as described in
C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders, LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, TOMS 8(1), 43–71 (1982).
C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders, Algorithm 583; LSQR: Sparse linear equations and least-squares problems, TOMS 8(2), 195–209 (1982).
It is licensed under the following BSD license:
Copyright (c) 2006, Systems Optimization Laboratory All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
- Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- Neither the name of Stanford University nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
The Fortran code was translated to Python for use in CVXOPT by Jeffery Kline with contributions by Mridul Aanjaneya and Bob Myhill.
Adapted for SciPy by Stefan van der Walt.
supreme.resolve.lsqr.lsqr(A, AT, n, b[, ...]) | Find the least-squares solution to a large, sparse, linear system of equations. |
lsqr¶
- supreme.resolve.lsqr.lsqr(A, AT, n, b, damp=0.0, atol=1e-08, btol=1e-08, conlim=100000000.0, iter_lim=None, show=False, calc_var=False)¶
Find the least-squares solution to a large, sparse, linear system of equations.
The function solves Ax = b or min ||b - Ax||^2 or ``min ||Ax - b||^2 + d^2 ||x||^2.
The matrix A may be square or rectangular (over-determined or under-determined), and may have any rank.
1. Unsymmetric equations -- solve A*x = b 2. Linear least squares -- solve A*x = b in the least-squares sense 3. Damped least squares -- solve ( A )*x = ( b ) ( damp*I ) ( 0 ) in the least-squares sense
Parameters: A : callable A(x, m, n)
Calculate A*x where A is a large, sparse (m, n) array.
AT : callable AT(x, m, n)
Calculate A^T * x.
n : int
Number of columns in A.
b : (m,) ndarray
Right-hand side vector b.
damp : float
Damping coefficient.
atol, btol : float
Stopping tolerances. If both are 1.0e-9 (say), the final residual norm should be accurate to about 9 digits. (The final x will usually have fewer correct digits, depending on cond(A) and the size of damp.)
conlim : float
Another stopping tolerance. lsqr terminates if an estimate of cond(A) exceeds conlim. For compatible systems Ax = b, conlim could be as large as 1.0e+12 (say). For least-squares problems, conlim should be less than 1.0e+8. Maximum precision can be obtained by setting atol = btol = conlim = zero, but the number of iterations may then be excessive.
iter_lim : int
Explicit limitation on number of iterations (for safety).
show : bool
Display an iteration log.
calc_var : bool
Whether to estimate diagonals of (A'A + damp^2*I)^{-1}.
Returns: x : ndarray of float
The final solution.
istop : int
Gives the reason for termination. 1 means x is an approximate solution to Ax = b. 2 means x approximately solves the least-squares problem.
itn : int
Iteration number upon termination.
r1norm : float
norm(r), where r = b - Ax.
r2norm : float
sqrt( norm(r)^2 + damp^2 * norm(x)^2 ). Equal to r1norm if damp == 0.
anorm : float
Estimate of Frobenius norm of Abar = [[A]; [damp*I]].
acond : float
Estimate of cond(Abar).
arnorm : float
Estimate of norm(A'*r - damp^2*x).
xnorm : float
norm(x)
var : ndarray of float
If calc_var is True, estimates all diagonals of (A'A)^{-1} (if damp == 0) or more generally (A'A + damp^2*I)^{-1}. This is well defined if A has full column rank or damp > 0. (Not sure what var means if rank(A) < n and damp = 0.)
Notes
LSQR uses an iterative method to approximate the solution. The number of iterations required to reach a certain accuracy depends strongly on the scaling of the problem. Poor scaling of the rows or columns of A should therefore be avoided where possible.
For example, in problem 1 the solution is unaltered by row-scaling. If a row of A is very small or large compared to the other rows of A, the corresponding row of ( A b ) should be scaled up or down.
In problems 1 and 2, the solution x is easily recovered following column-scaling. Unless better information is known, the nonzero columns of A should be scaled so that they all have the same Euclidean norm (e.g., 1.0).
In problem 3, there is no freedom to re-scale if damp is nonzero. However, the value of damp should be assigned only after attention has been paid to the scaling of A.
The parameter damp is intended to help regularize ill-conditioned systems, by preventing the true solution from being very large. Another aid to regularization is provided by the parameter acond, which may be used to terminate iterations before the computed solution becomes very large.
If some initial estimate x0 is known and if damp == 0, one could proceed as follows:
- Compute a residual vector r0 = b - A*x0.
- Use LSQR to solve the system A*dx = r0.
- Add the correction dx to obtain a final solution x = x0 + dx.
This requires that x0 be available before and after the call to LSQR. To judge the benefits, suppose LSQR takes k1 iterations to solve A*x = b and k2 iterations to solve A*dx = r0. If x0 is “good”, norm(r0) will be smaller than norm(b). If the same stopping tolerances atol and btol are used for each system, k1 and k2 will be similar, but the final solution x0 + dx should be more accurate. The only way to reduce the total work is to use a larger stopping tolerance for the second system. If some value btol is suitable for A*x = b, the larger value btol*norm(b)/norm(r0) should be suitable for A*dx = r0.
Preconditioning is another way to reduce the number of iterations. If it is possible to solve a related system M*x = b efficiently, where M approximates A in some helpful way (e.g. M - A has low rank or its elements are small relative to those of A), LSQR may converge more rapidly on the system A*M(inverse)*z = b, after which x can be recovered by solving M*x = z.
If A is symmetric, LSQR should not be used!
Alternatives are the symmetric conjugate-gradient method (cg) and/or SYMMLQ. SYMMLQ is an implementation of symmetric cg that applies to any symmetric A and will converge more rapidly than LSQR. If A is positive definite, there are other implementations of symmetric cg that require slightly less work per iteration than SYMMLQ (but will take the same number of iterations).
References
[R20] C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders (1982a). “LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares”, ACM TOMS 8(1), 43-71. [R21] C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders (1982b). “Algorithm 583. LSQR: Sparse linear equations and least squares problems”, ACM TOMS 8(2), 195-209. [R22] M. A. Saunders (1995). “Solution of sparse rectangular systems using LSQR and CRAIG”, BIT 35, 588-604.